INTRODUCTION
- This activity is best as a small group activity. See Facilitator Tips for ways to create groups.
ACTIVITY
- Participants break down Commitment V into different components. For example, this could be the different actors within the commitment or the responsibilities owed within Commitment V.
- Participants break down Commitment V in a way that makes sense to them and share their ideas with each other.
- Participants can look for different ways to break down Commitment V.
See Resources tab for Commitment V slides.
CONCLUSION
- The facilitator brings the participants together for a group discussion.
- Each group shares the way/ways they broke down Commitment V and why they chose to do it.
- Participants share how those components look in their own societies/faith communities.
There are no specific discussion questions for this activity.
Tips for Small Group Activity
- The facilitator can divide participants into small groups of 2-4 people depending on the size of the group.
- If this activity is held in-person, the facilitator can invite participants to sit together.
- If participants are meeting together virtually, the facilitator can assign break-out rooms.
General Tips
- The #Faith4Rights modules are flexible and require adaptation by the facilitators before their use. Case studies related to peer-to-peer exercises in the 18 modules need to be selected by the facilitators from within the environment where the learning takes place. The #Faith4Rights toolkit is a prototype methodology that requires contextualization, based on the text of the 18 commitments, context and additional supporting documents.
- Not all issues raised need to be resolved. This would be an impossible and even a counterproductive target. The aim is rather to enhance critical thinking and communication skills, admitting that some questions could receive many answers, depending on numerous factors.
- Tensions may occur during discussions related to “faith” and “rights”. Most of these tensions are due to human interpretations. Learning sessions are spaces for constructive dialogue in a dynamic process where tensions can be reduced with the help of clear methodologies, including pre-emptive situation analysis and evidence of positive results in areas of intersectionality between faith and rights.
- When preparing the sessions, facilitators need to factor in the profile, age and backgrounds of participants. Focused attention on the learning objectives can transform tensions into constructive exploration of new ideas.
- Meaningful engagement requires democratically pre-established rules. Facilitators should dedicate time with participants to elaborate these rules together at the outset and acting all along the training as their custodians.
- The time frames suggested in this #Faith4Rights toolkit are merely indicative. Facilitators may adapt them freely to suit the needs of their group of participants. The key balance is between respecting the overall timeframe while not cutting short a positive exchange momentum.
- To ensure optimal and sustainable benefit, facilitators may create a “training notebook” for participants during their peer-to-peer learning sessions. It would contain a compilation of templates to help participants keep track of what they have learned throughout the programme and eventually use this notebook as their personalised follow-up tool.
- When technically feasible, facilitators are also advised to project the module under discussion on screen in order to alternate between discussions thereon and showing the audio-visual materials listed in each module or any other items selected by the facilitator themselves.