Peer-to-Peer Activity: Tweeting
Overview
Participants individually summarize Commitment IV in less than 140 characters with the intent to share on social media.
Competencies
- Participants are able to articulate the commitment in summarized terms.
- Participants articulate the importance of equality for everyone.
- Participants share the commitment with others via social media or some other means.
INTRODUCTION
- This exercise is meant to de-construct the commitment and re-energize the discussion.
- Possible example: “We commit to prevent the notions of ‘State religion’ and ‘doctrinal secularism’ from being used to discriminate or reduce the space for diversity of religions and beliefs.”
ACTIVITY
Allow participants time to individually summarize Commitment IV in less than 140 characters.
The facilitator may encourage participants to share their statements with the group.
CONCLUSION
- Participants should consider posting this statement on Twitter or another social media platform.
- What are the elements of Commitment IV?
- How can these be simplified?
- What action points are necessary?
- Who bears responsibility for action?
- How can I support and promote equal treatment of others of different faiths and/or beliefs?
- How are “state religion” or “doctrinal secularism” used to discriminate against individuals or groups?
Text of Commitment IV:
We pledge to support and promote equal treatment in all areas and manifestations of religion or belief and to denounce all forms of discriminatory practices. We commit to prevent the use of the notion of “State religion” to discriminate against any individual or group and we consider any such interpretation as contrary to the oneness of humanity and equal dignity of humankind. Similarly, we commit to prevent the use of “doctrinal secularism” from reducing the space for religious or belief pluralism in practice.
- The #Faith4Rights modules are flexible and require adaptation by the facilitators before their use. Case studies related to peer-to-peer exercises in the 18 modules need to be selected by the facilitators from within the environment where the learning takes place. The #Faith4Rights toolkit is a prototype methodology that requires contextualization, based on the text of the 18 commitments, context and additional supporting documents.
- Not all issues raised need to be resolved. This would be an impossible and even a counterproductive target. The aim is rather to enhance critical thinking and communication skills, admitting that some questions could receive many answers, depending on numerous factors.
- Tensions may occur during discussions related to “faith” and “rights”. Most of these tensions are due to human interpretations. Learning sessions are spaces for constructive dialogue in a dynamic process where tensions can be reduced with the help of clear methodologies, including pre-emptive situation analysis and evidence of positive results in areas of intersectionality between faith and rights.
- When preparing the sessions, facilitators need to factor in the profile, age and backgrounds of participants. Focused attention on the learning objectives can transform tensions into constructive exploration of new ideas.
- Meaningful engagement requires democratically pre-established rules. Facilitators should dedicate time with participants to elaborate these rules together at the outset and acting all along the training as their custodians.
- The time frames suggested in this #Faith4Rights toolkit are merely indicative. Facilitators may adapt them freely to suit the needs of their group of participants. The key balance is between respecting the overall timeframe while not cutting short a positive exchange momentum.
- To ensure optimal and sustainable benefit, facilitators may create a “training notebook” for participants during their peer-to-peer learning sessions. It would contain a compilation of templates to help participants keep track of what they have learned throughout the programme and eventually use this notebook as their personalised follow-up tool.
- When technically feasible, facilitators are also advised to project the module under discussion on screen in order to alternate between discussions thereon and showing the audio-visual materials listed in each module or any other items selected by the facilitator themselves.
“Then Peter began to speak: ‘I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism.’” (Acts 10:34)